Seth Godin thinks that for all the talk about privacy, what people really object to is being "surprised."If your credit card company called you up and said, "we've been looking over your records and we see that you've been having an extramarital affair. We'd like to offer you a free coupon for VD testing..." you'd freak out, and for good reason.

If the local authorities start using what's on the corner surveillance cameras to sell you a new kind of commuter token, you'd be a little annoyed at that as well.
He thinks that companies get away with invading our privacy by avoiding surprise, and we're inclined to agree with him. After all, Facebook is still collecting data from "Beacon," but since you can opt-out of the "news feed" surprise, people are happy.

Seth says:This leads us to Ask.com's new Eraser service, which promises to not remember stuff about your searching. The problem they face: most people want Google and Yahoo and Amazon to remember their searches, because it leads to better results and (so far) rarely leads to surprises. What do you think? Do people really care about privacy?

Here's an interesting fact in Stealing porn from customer's computers isn't just for A senior database administrator for Fidelity National Information Services, a widely used banking technology and data providor, Don't like Facebook In a funny twist of fate, last week Facebook failed in its attempt to force a site to remove incriminating and/or embarrassing personal information about Facebook's founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. We think Facebook missed a real opportunity here—they should have distributed the documents personally and attached ads to them.

What's even more bizarre is that the information that's now in the public eye had originally been sealed by court order during an earlier trial, and a reporter only got access to it through what appears to be an honest mistake by a records clerk. But now that it's out there, it's out there for good."[The reporter] said he had obtained the papers in mid-September from the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston, which considered a part of the case, where a clerk apparently made a mistake a